- INCAMERA METER CALIBRATION RAWDIGGER SOFTWARE
- INCAMERA METER CALIBRATION RAWDIGGER ISO
- INCAMERA METER CALIBRATION RAWDIGGER PROFESSIONAL
Know what you're doing regarding your JPEG settings Are capable of consistently decent exposure You're statement of JPEG being in some way better than RAW is of course blasphemy, a sacrilege even and people are going to crucify you for it in most places except this forum, where people are generally nice and are just going to give advice on proper RAW editing and suitable software. I generally use NR-2 up to 6400 ASA and -1 above.
INCAMERA METER CALIBRATION RAWDIGGER ISO
IMO, your camera is set to a too high amount of NR for the low ISO you are using. The RAF shows more noise and more detail while the camera got rid of the noise in the JPEG at the expense of some detail. The JPEG was processed by the camera and the RAF, to a lesser degree, by your software. But RAW is still a better choice if you prefer to process your images from scratch.Ĭlick to expand.That's how it should be and your sample images look very much as expected. Very many people are happy shooting JPEG these days (especially Fuji Shooters) and there's nothing at all wrong with that. So if you are happy with the choices that Fuji make on your behalf - and feel your time is better spent shooting more images - then it's fantastic to have that option.
But they are also very much less convenient. RAW files have more bit depth, more white balance flexibility, more dynamic range etc. Whenever you process from RAW to JPEG (in camera or in post-production) you are, as it were, "fixing" the image. Bottom line Computers are more flexible and powerful so "anything you can do - I can do better" (as the song goes).
INCAMERA METER CALIBRATION RAWDIGGER SOFTWARE
Now the camera may have some Fuji created "secret sauce" (as witnessed by the recent software that allows your computer to access this via a USB connection) but there's an obvious limit to how far anyone can take this argument. Where do you think the JPEG came from in the first place? It was processed from the RAW by the camera. However, you simply cannot say that there is anything in the JPEG that cannot be reproduced from the RAW. So JPEG shooting is definitely a good choice for some. Any time not having to be spent on post-processing has surely got to be a major benefit? For many Amateurs (who shoot for love not money) the case may well be different because post-processing can (for some) be very much part of the image making process.
INCAMERA METER CALIBRATION RAWDIGGER PROFESSIONAL
I strongly suspect that many Professional Photographers have moved this way in recent years because (for a Pro) "time is money". Couple this with the massive convenience advantage that JPEG have, and you can completely understand why many more Photographers are happy shooting JPEG only. There is zero doubt that JPEG images have come a huge way in recent years and, in particular, many people are hugely impressed by what Fuji have achieved in this area. Technically what you are saying about RAW vs JPEG cannot possibly be true. (one small issue of lens creep, both while pointed down, also, opposite while aiming up) My final product is the print and the JPEG SOOC is just as clean or cleaner than my worked RAW file then converted to JPEG.īTW, the 100-400 w/ 1.4 TC rocks for birds. If this is what is to be expected, dare I say it.do I even need RAW? (granted if I am doing a paid wedding, I will prob still use RAW as a safety blanket, but even then.if the camera is that good.I can at least hope. However, I can't even get close to the low noise in the RAW files that the JPEG already has. Is this normal? I am totally floored that apart from some brightness variances, the noise reduction on the JPEG is phenomenal and comparing my RAW edits to the JPEG, it seems my preferences are easily duplicated w/ JPEG. (I don't use LR, cuz I am able to do more in PS, so why bother w/ LR (and I don't use the library function).
The RAWs have some artifacts that when magnified become obvious, and don't vanish in software. I finally got out and started doing wildlife this past weekend and made an observation that I can't believe I am about type out.
0 kommentar(er)
